Security Posture & Findings across clouds
The cloud-native console that scores your estate and raises findings - Security Hub, Defender for Cloud, Security Command Center, Cloud Guard - configured so the findings reach a person.
4 verified modules - all static-validated and publish-checked; live-test pending.
Compare by provider
| Provider | Module | Verification |
|---|---|---|
| AWS | Security Hub with Chosen Standards | static-validated |
| Azure | Defender Plans that Are Actually On | static-validated |
| Google Cloud | Findings that Reach a Topic, Mutes that Say Why | static-validated |
| Oracle Cloud | A Cloud Guard Target whose Responders Respond | static-validated |
How to choose
Every one of these is on by default and inert by default: the score page fills, the paid detection plans are off, the responders wait for a click, the findings stay on a page nobody is paged from. Compare what it costs to turn detection on per resource type, whether it can remediate on its own, and how findings leave the console - a topic, a SIEM, an email.
When not to use
A posture score is a recommendation queue, not a control. None of these stops a misconfiguration from being created; the ones that can act after the fact do so only when told to, and the guardrails that refuse a resource outright are different products.