Password Aging That Reaches The Accounts A Host Already Has

EL ships PASS_MAX_DAYS 99999, so no password expires, and INACTIVE -1 in a second file, so one that does expire still lets you in. This role sets both, then brings the accounts created before it into the policy, which login.defs alone never does. The live test creates an account first, records what it was given, and proves the change. Original role, live-tested on Rocky Linux 10.

ansibleSecurity & Secrets

Verification

Live-tested

Really deployed to a container sandbox, proven idempotent (a second run changes nothing), verified against the role’s assertions, then torn down.

Conformance

  • Static validation (yamllint · ansible-lint)

Provenance

  • SHA-256 checksum
  • Signature (pending)

Functional

  • Live-tested - applied, verified, destroyed

Last verified 2026-09-27 · podman 4.9.3 · ansible 2.21.4 · how we verify

Cite it in your README

badge · attribution

Paste this beside the module in the repository that uses it. The badge is rendered from this artifact's verification record, so it reads live-tested because the record says so, and the link lands on this page.

README.md, GitLab, Gitea
[![IaC Bazaar: live-tested](https://www.iac-bazaar.com/api/artifacts/ansible-login-defs/badge)](https://www.iac-bazaar.com/catalog/ansible-login-defs?utm_source=syndication&utm_medium=readme&utm_campaign=artifact)

Ansible role 1.0.0, live-tested on IaC Bazaar: [Password Aging That Reaches The Accounts A Host Already Has](https://www.iac-bazaar.com/catalog/ansible-login-defs?utm_source=syndication&utm_medium=readme&utm_campaign=artifact)

```yaml
# Password Aging That Reaches The Accounts A Host Already Has: https://www.iac-bazaar.com/catalog/ansible-login-defs (download from your IaC Bazaar account)
```

Preview:IaC Bazaar: live-tested

Documentation

login-defs

EL ships a complete password-aging policy set to 273 years. PASS_MAX_DAYS is 99999 out of the box, PASS_MIN_DAYS is 0, and INACTIVE - which is in a different file - is -1, so a password that does expire never stops working. This role sets all three, and then does the part that is usually left out: it brings the accounts the host already has into the policy, because login.defs only ever describes what useradd will do next time.

No download, and no version to pin. shadow-utils is part of EL 10. What the role owns is two of the distribution's files - it edits the lines it sets and leaves the rest, since there is no login.defs.d to drop into - and the proof that accounts really get what those lines describe.

The two files are read by different tools, which is why both are here. login.defs decides when a password expires; /etc/default/useradd decides how long an expired password still lets you in. A policy that sets only the first expires passwords and locks nobody out.

A policy in login.defs binds accounts created after it lands, and nothing else. Measured: an account made before the policy kept 99999 after the role wrote 365, and only chage moved it. That is why login_defs_apply_to_existing defaults to true and why the live test creates an account BEFORE the role runs, records what it got, and asserts both that the account now carries the policy and that it did not before. Without the second half the test would pass on a host where nothing ever changed.

Nothing validates either file, and a bad value fails OPEN. With PASS_MAX_DAYS notanumber, useradd printed "configuration error - cannot parse PASS_MAX_DAYS value" on stderr, exited 0, and created the account with a maximum of -1. So the live test reads what an account was actually given rather than reading the file back, and it reads /etc/shadow's own fields rather than chage -l: chage reports "Password inactive: never" whenever the password never expires, whatever the inactive field holds, which is how a policy that is half applied reads as a policy that is absent.

root is outside the policy by default. login_defs_existing_min_uid is 1000, so the role never ages root's password. An expired root password on a host with no console is the one mistake here that cannot be undone from the outside. Lower it deliberately if a baseline demands root aging, and make sure there is another way in first.

ENCRYPT_METHOD is here to be kept, not changed. EL 10 already chooses yescrypt ($y$ in /etc/shadow). The role sets it anyway and the test asserts the prefix, so a host that is quietly returned to SHA512 by something else shows up as a failure instead of as nothing at all.

License

Commercial - IaC Bazaar EULA. (c) IaC Bazaar.

Usage code & full reference need an account

The complete copy-paste usage, the full input/output reference, and operational notes are free with an account - shown here and bundled in the download. Sign in and this section fills in.

  • Variables
  • Test

Related modules

Live-tested

ansible-aide

AIDE from AppStream on EL 10: a watched tree, a baseline database built once, and the oneshot unit and timer the package does not ship. The live test passes on an unchanged host, FAILS when a file appears inside a watched path and names it, ignores one inside an excluded path, and passes again once the change is gone. Original role, live-tested on Rocky Linux 10.

View module
Live-tested

ansible-authelia

Authelia from the upstream release (sha256-verified) as a hardened system service on loopback with file users and sqlite; its secrets are generated once on the host and reach the service as AUTHELIA_*_FILE variables. The live test hashes a password with Authelia's hasher, logs in, sees a wrong password refused and an anonymous visitor sent to the portal. Original role, live-tested on Rocky 10.

View module
Live-tested

ansible-bandit

bandit on EL 10 from PyPI into a venv of its own with a link in the PATH; the live test runs pip check, then scans a module that passes a string to subprocess.call with shell=True (B602, High, exit 1) and a clean module (exit 0). Pinned. Original role, live-tested on Rocky Linux 10.

View module
Live-tested

ansible-boundary

boundary on EL 10 from releases.hashicorp.com; SHA256SUMS is signature-checked against HashiCorp's key before get_url trusts it, the live test re-checks both, then runs authenticate against a dead address ('connection refused') and database init with a throwaway config (parsed, root key loaded, then the database refused). Pinned. Original role, live-tested on Rocky Linux 10.

View module
Live-tested

ansible-dockle

dockle on EL 10 from the GitHub release; get_url refuses it unless its SHA-256 is in the vendor's checksums file, and the live test re-checks it, then scans a one-layer image whose config names no user, expecting CIS-DI-0001 in the output, exit code 1 with --exit-level warn, and the warning counted in the JSON form. Pinned. Original role, live-tested on Rocky Linux 10.

View module
Live-tested

ansible-gitleaks

gitleaks on EL 10 from the GitHub release, refused by Ansible's get_url unless its SHA-256 is the one in the project's checksums file, and re-checked with sha256sum -c by the live test, which then plants a file holding an AWS access key that is not one and runs gitleaks detect over it, expecting 'leaks found: 1'. Original role, live-tested on Rocky Linux 10.

View module