A VPC Peering with the Routes on Both Sides and the Cross-Tenant Case Refused Early
A peering connection between two VPCs with a route written into every route table you list, on both sides, for every CIDR of the other side. A cross-tenant peering sits in PENDING_ACCEPTANCE and its other side is out of reach of this provider, so the module refuses an accepter route table list in that case rather than failing at apply.
This is the operations reference: version drift, dependants and neighbours. For what the module provisions, its inputs and outputs, and how to buy it, see the catalogue entry.
Provider drift
This artifact declares no Terraform provider requirements, so there is nothing to drift. Provider freshness applies to Terraform and OpenTofu modules.
What depends on this
No reference architecture names this module, so changing it affects only configurations that reference it directly.
Nearest alternatives
Same cloud, same category. These are what you would weigh against it without changing provider.
The same job on other clouds
Network Peering on other providers. Useful when the cloud is still open, or when you are pricing a second one. How far a comparison like that can be trusted is covered in comparing clouds.
Installing it
module "huawei_vpc_peering" {
source = "www.iac-bazaar.com/iac-bazaar/huawei-vpc-peering/huaweicloud"
version = "1.0.0"
}A registry token is required for the download itself. Installing through the registry protocol has the two credential steps.